Special Report

When Insurance Doesn't Respond: Canada's Most Consequential Coverage Disputes

About this publication

When a claim arrives, having insurance and having coverage aren't always the same thing. An insurer may agree to defend a lawsuit while reserving its position on indemnity, or decline to respond because it says the policy never insured the alleged loss. For a business facing litigation, that distinction is anything but academic.

Drawing on Progressive Homes, Ledcor and the Supreme Court's approach to interpreting contracts, this analysis explains the duty to defend, the limits of faulty workmanship exclusions and the difference between an insurer's claims decision and the protection it actually promised. It also examines what happens when a business relies on insurance to absorb risks that may have been allocated elsewhere.

Purchase this publication

An individual purchase gives you continued access to this work. It's separate from every membership, including Intelligence Premium.

Review purchase for CAD 1.34 →Secure Stripe checkout · Price in Canadian dollars, plus applicable tax.
Ask Binder Counsel

Keep the value working

Have Binder keep watching this for you.

Follow the issue, see what changes next and keep related Canadian developments attached to the same business context.

0Related developments
0Related cases
0Premium tools

About the author

Binder Insurance Editorial

Binder Intelligence institutional editorial byline

Original Binder Insurance research and analysis, prepared by Binder and reviewed under its editorial standards. No external human contributor is represented.

Institutional Binder editorial desk. Not an individual person or external contributor.

Read the source ↗