Case card

Yukon Court Sets Costs After Government Loses Standing Challenge

In Wright v Yukon, 2023 YKSC 15, the court determined costs following the Yukon government’s unsuccessful bid to dismiss a challenge for lack of standing. Chief Justice Duncan applied the 2009 tariff at Scale B and disallowed specified units and paralegal disbursements. The ruling concerned costs, not the underlying constitutionality of the tenancy termination law.

Across Binder Intelligence

One issue, different perspectives.

The same development can matter to managers, insurers, boards and institutions. Explore the related material each publication has independently verified.

ControlledYukon court awards Charter challenger $35,000 costs following eviction law rulingGovernanceYukon First Nation awarded $45,000 costs in mining exploration challengeGovernanceYukon cannabis licensing board defeats judicial review costs request
Binder Human Resources →Binder Insurance →Binder Governance →Binder Controlled →

The article is a starting point, not a legal strategy.

Binder brings the documents, correspondence and decisions surrounding a business issue into one Matter. When individual professional guidance is required, use an appropriately qualified lawyer.

See how Binder works →

Source and further context Yukon Courts ↗

Intelligence Law publishes commentary and information, not individualized legal advice. Legal rules and court procedure vary by jurisdiction and circumstances.

2023 YKSC 15 | Yukon Standing Challenge Costs