Case card

Peoples Department Stores Inc. (Trustee of) v. Wise, 2004 SCC 68

The Supreme Court dismissed the trustee's appeal. Directors owe their statutory fiduciary duty to the corporation rather than directly to its creditors, although creditors' interests may be considered. The Wise directors did not breach the applicable duty of care on the facts.

Source reviewed · Court holding

Held. The Supreme Court dismissed the trustee's appeal.

The bankruptcy trustee of Peoples Department Stores sued the Wise brothers over a joint inventory purchasing arrangement adopted while they directed Peoples and its parent company. The trustee alleged that the arrangement unfairly favoured the parent and harmed the subsidiary's creditors.

The Supreme Court dismissed the trustee's appeal. It distinguished the statutory fiduciary obligation, which is owed to the corporation, from the duty of care under section 122(1)(b) of the Canada Business Corporations Act. The Court said that creditors may be among the stakeholders whose interests are considered as a corporation's circumstances change. That doesn't create a separate general fiduciary duty to those creditors.

The Court also held that the Wise brothers had not breached the statutory duty of care in adopting the arrangement on the evidence before it. This is a judgment on the particular allegations and records, rather than blanket permission for directors to disregard creditors whenever a corporation is in financial difficulty.

For governance, the case shows why a decision record must explain the corporation's interests, the information considered and the board's process. Directors should not simply invoke their duties as a slogan when the business is facing financial trouble.

Source

Across Binder Intelligence

One issue, different perspectives.

The same development can matter to managers, insurers, boards and institutions. Explore the related material each publication has independently verified.

LawAction4Canada v British Columbia, 2026 BCSC 1974Human ResourcesLacosse and Dyck v Childhood Discoveries Preschool (2013)ControlledBurke, Chudy, Stastny and Nukon-Blake v Yukon Government (2018)
Binder Human Resources →Binder Law →Binder Insurance →Binder Controlled →

Binder · The business behind your business

Reading about it is one thing. Managing your own governance matter is another.

Board decisions depend on minutes, agreements, policies, correspondence and follow-up. Preserve the reasons and the responsibilities in one Matter. Binder organizes what you know and helps you recognize what still needs attention.

Develop the Governance skill

Ethics, Values, and Governance Integrity

Explore this Binder University course

Follow related Canadian governance issues and compare Intelligence membership options through Binder Intelligence.

Original source Supreme Court of Canada ↗

This publication provides general information, not legal advice. Requirements can differ by organization and province.