← University
Product Liability: When Your Product Causes Harm
0 of 4

A regional housewares company based in southern Ontario has operated for 14 years as both a manufacturer of certain product lines and a distributor of goods sourced from overseas suppliers. The company designs and produces a line of small kitchen appliances at its own facility while also importing complementary products from 3 manufacturing partners in Asia, which it rebrands and sells through major Canadian retail chains and its own e-commerce platform. Annual revenues have grown to approximately $8.5 million, with imported goods accounting for roughly 60 percent of sales volume.

The incident that now demands attention occurred when a consumer suffered serious burns after a portable electric kettle malfunctioned during ordinary use. The kettle was part of the company's imported line, sourced from an overseas manufacturer with whom the company has maintained a supply relationship for 7 years. The consumer, a 34-year-old woman, sustained 2nd-degree burns to her hand and forearm when the kettle's lid mechanism failed, causing boiling water to discharge unexpectedly. She required emergency medical treatment and has been unable to work at her regular employment for 6 weeks. Her lawyer has sent a demand letter to the company seeking compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering, with the total claim exceeding $85,000.

Initial investigation reveals several complicating factors. The kettle's design originated with the overseas manufacturer, but the company's product development team requested modifications to the lid assembly 18 months ago to accommodate a different aesthetic for the Canadian market. The company's quality control records show that incoming shipments of this product line underwent spot-check inspection at a rate of 1 in every 50 units, consistent with its standard practice for imported goods. The product packaging and instruction manual were prepared by the company's marketing department and do not include certain safety warnings that appear on the manufacturer's original documentation.

The company carries a commercial general liability policy with $2 million in coverage, though the policy contains exclusions that may affect coverage for product-related claims. No formal recall planning protocol exists, and the company has received 2 other consumer complaints about the same kettle model within the past 8 months, neither of which resulted in injury but both of which described similar lid mechanism concerns. The overseas manufacturer has offered limited cooperation, citing contractual provisions that purport to allocate liability entirely to the Canadian distributor. Records of the design modification request, quality inspection logs, correspondence with the overseas supplier, and the company's insurance policy all bear on the questions of responsibility, exposure, and appropriate response.

Product Liability in Canada: The Negligence Framework and Who It Reaches

Product liability represents one of the most significant areas of legal risk for any business that manufactures, distributes, sells, or even repairs physical goods. At its core, product liability law addresses a fundamental question: when a product causes injury or damage, who bears responsibility? For Canadian business owners, understanding this framework is not merely an academic exercise. It directly shapes how you design products, select suppliers, communicate with customers, and structure your operations to minimize exposure to claims that can threaten the financial survival of your enterprise.

The foundation of product liability in Canada rests primarily on the law of negligence, which operates under the broader umbrella of tort law. Unlike contract law, which governs disputes arising from agreements between parties, tort law addresses civil wrongs that cause harm regardless of any contractual relationship. This distinction matters enormously for businesses because it means your potential liability extends far beyond the customers who purchase directly from you. Anyone foreseeably harmed by your product may bring a negligence claim against you, whether they bought the product themselves, received it as a gift, borrowed it from a neighbour, or simply happened to be standing nearby when it malfunctioned.

The negligence framework in Canadian common law provinces, including British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland and Labrador, requires a plaintiff to establish several elements to succeed in a claim. They must demonstrate that the defendant owed them a duty of care, that the defendant breached the applicable standard of care, that the breach caused the plaintiff's injury or loss, and that the resulting damages were not too remote from the negligent conduct. Each element must be proven on a balance of probabilities, meaning the plaintiff must show it is more likely than not that each requirement has been satisfied.

That’s the free preview

You’ve reached the end of what’s open to read. The rest of this lesson is part of a $79 course — purchasing unlocks it, or sign in if you already have access.