← University
The PPSA: Secured Transactions and Priority
0 of 6

A regional equipment manufacturer in southwestern Ontario had operated profitably for 12 years before a sharp downturn in orders left it unable to service its debts. When the company missed 2 consecutive monthly payments on its operating line of credit, the bank that had financed its operations since inception moved to assess its position. What the bank discovered complicated matters considerably: at least 3 other creditors asserted security interests in the same pool of assets the bank had long considered its primary collateral.

The manufacturer had obtained its original operating facility through a 10-year equipment financing arrangement with the bank, granting security over all present and after-acquired equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable. The bank registered its financing statement in the provincial personal property registry within days of advancing the first funds. Over the following years, as the business grew, additional financing relationships developed. A specialty supplier of raw materials had extended trade credit on terms that included a security agreement covering inventory derived from its materials. An equipment dealer had sold the manufacturer a computerized milling system valued at $340,000 under a conditional sales contract, retaining a purchase-money security interest in the machine. More recently, a private lender had advanced $175,000 to the company's principal shareholder, who in turn injected the funds into the business; that lender held a general security agreement covering all of the company's assets, registered 8 months after the bank's original financing statement.

The manufacturer's default triggered simultaneous demands from multiple creditors, each claiming entitlement to seize or realize upon overlapping categories of collateral. The bank pointed to its comprehensive security agreement and longstanding registration. The equipment dealer asserted that its purchase-money interest in the milling system took priority regardless of when the bank had registered. The raw materials supplier argued that its security interest attached specifically to identifiable inventory and its proceeds. The private lender maintained that its general security agreement, though registered later, covered assets acquired after the bank's original registration.

The company's remaining assets consisted of approximately $520,000 in equipment, $180,000 in finished inventory, $95,000 in raw materials, and $210,000 in outstanding accounts receivable. The combined claims of all secured creditors exceeded $1.4 million. How these competing interests would be ranked, which creditor could enforce against which assets, and what procedural requirements governed any seizure or disposition of collateral all turned on the application of personal property security legislation to the specific facts of when and how each security interest had been created, whether and when each had been perfected, and how the statutory priority rules resolved the competing claims.

Enforcement: What a Secured Creditor Can Do When the Debtor Defaults

When a debtor fails to meet their obligations under a security agreement, the secured creditor enters a new phase of the relationship, one defined not by cooperation but by enforcement. The Personal Property Security Act, known across common law provinces as the PPSA, provides secured creditors with a structured framework for realizing on their security interest when default occurs. Understanding what a secured creditor can do upon default is essential knowledge for any business owner, whether you are the debtor facing enforcement or a creditor contemplating your options. This lesson examines the enforcement mechanisms available under Canadian secured transactions law, the procedural safeguards that protect debtors, and the practical realities of how these rules play out in commercial settings from Halifax to Vancouver.

Default itself is not defined uniformly by statute. Instead, security agreements typically specify what constitutes a default, which may include failure to make scheduled payments, breach of representations or warranties, failure to maintain insurance on collateral, unauthorized disposition of collateral, or the debtor's insolvency or bankruptcy. The parties themselves determine through their contract what events will trigger enforcement rights, though the most common default is simply the failure to pay amounts owing when due. Once default occurs, the secured creditor's rights transform from a conditional interest in collateral to an enforceable claim that can be exercised through seizure, sale, or retention of the secured property. The PPSA in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and Ontario, as well as equivalent legislation in other common law provinces, establishes the procedures that govern this enforcement process. Quebec operates under an entirely different framework through the Civil Code of Quebec, which governs hypothecs and their realization through distinct mechanisms that we will address where the approaches diverge.

That’s the free preview

You’ve reached the end of what’s open to read. The rest of this lesson is part of a $149 course — purchasing unlocks it, or sign in if you already have access.