← University
Insurance Obligations in Commercial Leases: Named vs. Additional Insured
0 of 4

The certificate of insurance arrived by email on the afternoon before the tenant took possession, a single-page document listing the commercial landlord as a certificate holder and showing general liability coverage of $2,000,000 per occurrence with a $5,000,000 aggregate. The landlord's property manager filed it in the tenant's lease folder and marked the insurance requirement as satisfied. That was 14 months ago.

The tenant, a specialty food retailer, had signed a 5-year lease for a 3,200 square foot unit in a mixed-use commercial building in a mid-sized Ontario city. The lease contained standard insurance provisions requiring the tenant to maintain commercial general liability insurance with limits of not less than $2,000,000, to carry property insurance covering the tenant's improvements and business contents, and to add the landlord as an additional insured on all liability policies. The lease further required the tenant to provide the landlord with certificates of insurance upon request and to ensure that each policy contained an endorsement requiring the insurer to provide the landlord with 30 days written notice before any cancellation or material change.

When a customer slipped on a wet floor in the tenant's premises and sustained injuries requiring hospitalization, the landlord discovered for the first time that the certificate of insurance it had received did not mean what it had assumed. The certificate identified the landlord only as a certificate holder, not as an additional insured. The tenant's insurance broker confirmed that no additional insured endorsement had ever been issued naming the landlord. The broker noted that the certificate itself stated clearly, in small print at the bottom, that it was issued as a matter of information only and conferred no rights upon the certificate holder.

The injured customer has now retained counsel and sent a demand letter naming both the tenant and the landlord as defendants, alleging that the landlord failed to maintain the premises in a safe condition and that the tenant was negligent in allowing water to accumulate on the floor. The demand seeks damages of $450,000 for medical expenses, lost income, and pain and suffering. The landlord's own commercial property and liability policy provides coverage for claims arising from common areas but contains an exclusion for claims arising from premises leased to tenants where the tenant was required by lease to maintain insurance.

The landlord has now reviewed the lease provisions in detail and discovered that while the tenant's certificate of insurance showed coverage existed at the time of lease commencement, there is no evidence that the landlord was ever actually added as an additional insured on the policy, no record that the required endorsement for 30 days notice of cancellation was ever obtained, and no documentation confirming whether the tenant's current coverage remains in force. The tenant has not responded to the landlord's requests for updated insurance documentation.

Certificates of Insurance: What They Prove and What They Do Not

A certificate of insurance is one of the most commonly exchanged documents in commercial real estate transactions across Canada, yet it remains one of the most frequently misunderstood. Landlords routinely request these certificates from tenants before granting possession of leased premises, and tenants routinely provide them believing they have satisfied their insurance obligations under the lease. This exchange happens thousands of times each day in commercial buildings from Halifax to Vancouver, and in a significant number of those transactions, one or both parties holds a fundamentally incorrect understanding of what the certificate actually accomplishes. The certificate of insurance is not itself a contract of insurance. It does not create coverage. It does not guarantee coverage will continue. It does not bind the insurance company to honour claims. It is, at its core, nothing more than a snapshot taken at a single moment in time, showing what coverage existed when the certificate was issued. Understanding this distinction is essential for anyone operating a business in leased commercial space or managing commercial properties, because the gap between what parties believe a certificate proves and what it actually proves can translate directly into significant uninsured losses.

The legal foundation for understanding certificates of insurance begins with the nature of insurance contracts themselves. In all Canadian provinces, insurance policies are contracts between the insured party and the insurance company, governed by provincial insurance legislation and the common law of contracts in most provinces, or by the Civil Code of Quebec in that province. The Insurance Act in Ontario, the Insurance Act in British Columbia, the Insurance Act in Alberta, and equivalent statutes in other common law provinces establish the regulatory framework within which these contracts operate, while Quebec's framework flows from the Civil Code of Quebec read alongside the Act respecting insurance, as of the date of authorship. Regardless of which provincial framework applies, the fundamental principle remains consistent across the country: the insurance policy is the contract, and only the policy itself defines the actual coverage, the actual limits, the actual exclusions, and the actual conditions that must be satisfied for a claim to be paid. A certificate of insurance is a document prepared by an insurance broker or agent that summarizes certain information from the underlying policy, but the certificate is not the policy and cannot modify or expand the policy's terms.

That’s the free preview

You’ve reached the end of what’s open to read. The rest of this lesson is part of a $79 course — purchasing unlocks it, or sign in if you already have access.