← University
Collective Agreement Rights in a Disciplinary Investigation
0 of 6

A corrections officer with nearly 20 years of unblemished service at an Alberta correctional institution was placed on paid administrative leave in February following a vague complaint about alleged off-duty communications with current or former inmates. No specifics were provided—no names, dates, or details. The officer received full pay but no updates for 14 months, with no opportunity to provide an account or respond to evidence. In February of the following year, the officer was summoned to a meeting where the warden and a regional manager delivered immediate termination for cause. No findings, evidence, or reasoning were explained beyond the termination letter's bare statement of cause. Health benefits ended with employment, leaving the officer without coverage for family prescriptions and ongoing therapy that had provided support during the prolonged uncertainty of the investigation period.

Procedural Fairness in a Unionized Workplace Investigation

When the phone rang at 7:45 AM on an otherwise unremarkable Tuesday morning, the senior corrections officer who answered had no reason to anticipate that the call would mark the beginning of a fourteen-month ordeal that would ultimately cost him his career, his professional reputation, and his sense of security in the workplace he had served for over a decade. The voice on the other end belonged to a human resources manager who informed him, in clipped and carefully rehearsed language, that he was being placed on administrative leave effective immediately. When he asked why, the response was simply that there had been a complaint and that an investigation would be conducted. When he asked what the complaint alleged, he was told that information could not be shared at this time. When he asked how long the leave would last, he was advised that he would be contacted when there were updates to provide. He was instructed not to attend the workplace, not to contact colleagues about work matters, and to remain available should the employer need to reach him. The call lasted less than five minutes, and when it ended, the officer was left standing in his kitchen with his morning coffee growing cold, stripped of his daily routine, his professional identity, and any understanding of what he was accused of having done.

That’s the free preview

You’ve reached the end of what’s open to read. The rest of this lesson is part of a $149 course — purchasing unlocks it, or sign in if you already have access.