← University
Sale of Goods: Rights, Warranties, and Risk of Loss
0 of 4

A purchase order for 4 commercial-grade food processing machines formed the basis of a transaction between a small manufacturing operation in Calgary and an expanding food production company in Saskatoon. The equipment, custom-built to the buyer's specifications and valued at $187,000, was ordered in early spring with delivery scheduled for 6 weeks later. The written purchase order specified the model numbers, technical specifications, and a delivery date, but said nothing about when ownership would transfer, who would bear the risk during shipment, or what would happen if the machines failed to perform as expected.

The manufacturer arranged for a third-party trucking company to transport the equipment from its Calgary facility to the buyer's Saskatoon plant. The buyer had no role in selecting the carrier and no contractual relationship with the trucking firm. During transit across the provincial border, the transport truck was involved in a collision that caused significant damage to 2 of the 4 machines. The remaining 2 machines arrived intact and were unloaded at the buyer's facility without incident.

Upon inspection of the undamaged machines, the buyer's production staff discovered that while the equipment matched the model numbers and external specifications in the purchase order, the internal components differed from what the buyer had expected based on earlier discussions with the manufacturer's sales representative. The machines could process food products, but at a rate approximately 30 percent slower than the buyer had anticipated when placing the order. No written documentation memorialized the earlier conversations about processing speed, and the purchase order itself was silent on throughput capacity.

The buyer now faces 3 distinct problems. First, 2 machines worth approximately $93,500 were damaged in transit and the buyer has been asked to pay the full contract price despite never having received functional equipment. Second, the 2 machines that arrived intact do not perform at the level the buyer believed it was purchasing, though they technically conform to the written specifications. Third, the buyer has already made a non-refundable deposit of $37,400 and must decide whether to reject what has been delivered, demand replacement or repair, or pursue damages for the difference between what was promised and what was received. The manufacturer maintains that risk passed to the buyer when the goods were handed over to the carrier and that the machines conform to the written contract in all material respects.

Implied Warranties: The Obligations That Attach to Every Sale of Goods

Every sale of goods in Canada carries with it a set of promises that the seller never explicitly makes. These promises, known as implied warranties, attach automatically to commercial transactions by operation of law, regardless of whether the parties discussed them, wrote them down, or even knew they existed. For business owners, sole proprietors, and non-profit operators who buy or sell goods as part of their regular activities, understanding these implied obligations is essential. They determine who bears responsibility when purchased goods fail to perform as expected, when products turn out to be unsuitable for their intended purpose, or when a seller's ownership of the goods comes into question. Unlike express warranties, which arise from specific statements, descriptions, or promises made by the seller, implied warranties exist because the law recognizes that certain baseline expectations should govern every commercial sale. They protect buyers who cannot reasonably inspect every aspect of what they purchase while simultaneously establishing clear standards that sellers must meet.

The foundation for implied warranties in Canadian common law provinces rests primarily in provincial Sale of Goods Acts, which trace their origins to the United Kingdom Sale of Goods Act of 1893. British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario, and the remaining common law provinces all maintain versions of this legislation that share the same fundamental structure and principles. While minor variations exist in language and section numbering, the core implied warranties recognized across these jurisdictions align closely with one another. Quebec, operating under its distinct civil law tradition, addresses similar concepts through the Civil Code of Quebec, which governs sales under a different conceptual framework but reaches comparable results in protecting buyers and establishing seller obligations. As of the date of authorship, these provincial regimes continue to operate independently, meaning that the applicable law depends on where the transaction occurs or, in some situations, what law the parties have chosen to govern their contract.

That’s the free preview

You’ve reached the end of what’s open to read. The rest of this lesson is part of a $79 course — purchasing unlocks it, or sign in if you already have access.