← University
Breach of Contract and Your Remedies
0 of 6

The contract was signed 14 months ago, a straightforward supply agreement between a small custom furniture manufacturer operating out of a commercial unit in a mid-sized Ontario city and a specialty lumber supplier based in the same region. The agreement called for the supplier to deliver certified sustainable hardwood in specified grades and dimensions, in 4 separate shipments spread across an 18-month period, to support the manufacturer's production of a commissioned furniture collection for a boutique hotel chain. The total contract value was $127,000, with payment terms requiring 30 percent upon signing and the balance in installments tied to each delivery. The manufacturer paid the initial deposit of $38,100 and received the first 2 shipments without incident.

The third shipment, scheduled for delivery 9 months into the agreement, did not arrive on the promised date. When the manufacturer contacted the supplier, a representative explained that supply chain disruptions had made the specified wood grades temporarily unavailable and offered to substitute a different species that the manufacturer had not requested and could not use for the commissioned project. The manufacturer declined the substitution and asked for a revised delivery timeline. The supplier responded 11 days later with a letter stating that it could not commit to any delivery date for the contracted materials and suggesting that the manufacturer source the remaining wood elsewhere if timing was critical.

The hotel chain's project carried a firm completion deadline, and the manufacturer had already begun fabrication work using the materials from the first 2 shipments. Without the third and fourth deliveries, the manufacturer faced the prospect of partially completed furniture, potential liability to the hotel chain for late delivery, and the need to locate alternative materials on short notice at higher cost. The manufacturer spent the following 3 weeks exploring options with other suppliers, eventually locating comparable wood from a source in British Columbia at a price $23,400 higher than what the original contract specified for the remaining 2 shipments. The manufacturer also incurred $4,200 in expedited freight charges to meet the project timeline.

The original supplier has not returned the unearned portion of the initial deposit, has not offered any compensation, and has not formally acknowledged that it has failed to perform under the contract. The manufacturer is now 6 weeks past the point when the third shipment should have arrived, has managed to keep the hotel project on track through the alternative sourcing, and is weighing how to proceed against the supplier. The manufacturer has documented the communications, the substitute sourcing costs, and the terms of the original agreement, but has not yet engaged legal counsel or sent any formal demand.

Practical Steps When a Contract Is Breached: What to Do and What Not to Do

When a contract breaks down, the immediate aftermath can feel disorienting. You might find yourself staring at an email from a supplier who has just informed you that they cannot deliver the materials you need for a project already underway, or perhaps you have opened a letter from a client announcing they will not be paying the final invoice despite your complete performance of the agreed work. In these moments, the emotional response is often to react quickly, whether through an angry phone call, an immediate threat of legal action, or conversely, a resigned acceptance that nothing can be done. None of these reactions serves your interests. What you do in the hours and days following a breach of contract can dramatically affect your ability to recover damages, preserve business relationships where salvageable, and protect yourself from counterclaims. This lesson provides you with a practical framework for responding to breach situations, drawing together the principles you have learned throughout this course and translating them into concrete actions you can take as a Canadian business owner, sole proprietor, or non-profit operator.

Understanding why immediate action matters requires appreciating how Canadian contract law treats the duties of both parties when a breach occurs. Across all common law provinces, including British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario, and the other provinces following the English common law tradition, the innocent party to a breach carries an obligation to mitigate their losses. This means you cannot simply sit back and allow damages to accumulate when reasonable steps could reduce or avoid those losses. The duty to mitigate is not optional, and failing to fulfill it can result in a court reducing any damages you might otherwise recover by the amount that proper mitigation would have saved. In Quebec, while the legal framework operates under the Civil Code of Quebec rather than common law principles, a similar obligation exists. Article 1479 of the Civil Code of Quebec, as of the date of authorship, establishes that a person who is injured by the fault of another must take reasonable steps to minimize the injury. Whether you operate in Halifax or Montreal, in Edmonton or Ottawa, this fundamental principle shapes what you must do when facing a breach.

That’s the free preview

You’ve reached the end of what’s open to read. The rest of this lesson is part of a $149 course — purchasing unlocks it, or sign in if you already have access.