Case Commentary

Continuing effects of old workplace restrictions did not restart human rights deadline

The BC Human Rights Tribunal dismissed a disability discrimination complaint as late because later workplace consequences flowed from earlier decisions rather than from new discriminatory acts.

The BC Human Rights Tribunal has dismissed a disability discrimination complaint because the workplace decisions being challenged were made years before the complaint was filed. Dr. Douglas Simak had worked as an instructor at Douglas College for many years. After a motor vehicle accident in 2016 left him with disabilities, a series of workplace incidents led the College to restrict his access to campus and his contact with certain colleagues. Simak alleged that his disabilities affected his conduct during some of those incidents and that the College responded to disability related behaviour as though it were simply a workplace conduct problem. He also challenged the College’s handling of his attempted return to work and restrictions that continued after he resumed teaching. The timing of those events became decisive. British Columbia’s Human Rights Code generally requires a complaint to be filed within one year of the alleged discrimination. Simak filed his complaint in October 2022. The most recent workplace decision that he characterized as discriminatory had been made in December 2018, when further restrictions were imposed on his contact with colleagues.

This is a preview. Full access remains subject to the reading allowance or membership.

Opening this Binder HR briefing…

Read the source ↗

Was this useful?