LawFree reading allowance
An Indemnity Clause May Not Transfer the Liability You Expected
A closer look at how the wording and transaction context can limit the liability an indemnity transfers.
An indemnity allocates defined losses between contracting parties; scope depends on the wording and its interaction with other clauses.
An indemnity clause allocates specified loss between contracting parties. It may require one party to reimburse the other for a direct loss, a third-party claim or both. The obligation depends on the complete contract: the trigger, causal language, covered losses, exclusions, claim procedure, liability cap and insurance provisions. The word “indemnify” alone does not answer those questions. A direct-loss indemnity addresses loss between the parties, such as the cost of correcting a representation that proved false. A third-party indemnity responds when someone outside the contract makes a claim, such as an intellectual-property, injury or tax claim. Draft the categories deliberately. A clause written around a third-party “claim” may not clearly cover the indemnitee’s own first-party loss. Conversely, wording covering every loss “arising out of” the agreement may reach far beyond third-party litigation.
Opening this article…
Related reading
More coverage connected to this article.
LawFree reading allowance
A closer look at how the wording and transaction context can limit the liability an indemnity transfers.
InsurancePremium
Contractual indemnities and insurance aren't the same promise. This explains the separate defence and payment questions.
Each publication keeps its usual reading allowance or membership requirements.