Board Response to Shareholder Activism and Derivative Action Demands
What this course covers
Scenario
A publicly traded mining company headquartered in Kamloops, British Columbia, with shares traded on both Canadian and South African exchanges, became the target of an attempted takeover in 2015-2016. When that bid failed after a proxy battle, the unsuccessful investor—operating through a numbered Ontario corporation that acquired shares in 2017—launched 5 separate legal proceedings between 2018 and 2024.
In March 2025, a British Columbia court struck all 3 remaining actions. The court found the investor lacked standing for oppression claims predating his shareholding, that conspiracy allegations failed to meet pleading standards, and that 2024 proceedings were derivative in nature but filed as oppression claims to avoid leave requirements. The court characterized the litigation as bearing hallmarks of vexatious proceedings—an attempt to accomplish through litigation what failed in the boardroom, seeking US$50 million in damages alongside orders to reconstitute the board.
More in this program
Rate this course
Complete the course to share your rating and feedback.
Comments & questions
Share a thought or ask a question about this course. No account needed.