← University
Negotiable Instruments: Cheques, Promissory Notes, and Bills
0 of 4

A promissory note for $47,000 and a dishonoured cheque for $12,500 sit in the files of a small equipment repair and fabrication business operating out of an industrial park in southwestern Ontario. The promissory note, dated 14 months ago, bears the signature of the sole proprietor of a landscaping operation and promises payment of the principal sum plus interest at 6 percent per annum, payable in full 12 months from the date of execution. The cheque, drawn on a credit union account and dated 3 months ago, was returned marked "insufficient funds" after the fabrication business deposited it in the ordinary course.

The promissory note arose from a transaction in which the fabrication business sold a refurbished commercial mower and a custom trailer hitch assembly to the landscaping operator. At the time of sale, the landscaping operator lacked the funds to pay outright and proposed a deferred payment arrangement. The parties agreed that the landscaping operator would sign a promissory note for the full purchase price, with the fabrication business retaining no security interest in the equipment. The note was prepared without legal assistance, handwritten on a single sheet, and signed by both parties. The fabrication business owner endorsed the note and placed it in a filing cabinet, intending to present it for payment when it matured.

The dishonoured cheque relates to a separate transaction. A general contractor engaged the fabrication business to manufacture custom steel brackets for a commercial renovation project. Upon delivery of the brackets, the contractor tendered a cheque for $12,500 drawn on a credit union account. The fabrication business deposited the cheque 4 days later, and within a week the credit union returned it unpaid. The contractor has since claimed that the brackets were defective and failed to meet the specifications agreed upon, asserting that any obligation to pay has been extinguished by the fabrication business's breach of the underlying supply agreement.

The promissory note matured 2 months ago. When the fabrication business owner contacted the landscaping operator to demand payment, the landscaping operator refused, alleging that the mower had a latent mechanical defect that rendered it unusable within weeks of delivery and that the fabrication business had misrepresented its condition at the time of sale. The landscaping operator maintains that fraud and failure of consideration excuse any obligation under the note.

The fabrication business owner now holds 2 unpaid instruments totalling $59,500 and faces competing claims from both obligors that their respective obligations should not be enforced. The owner must determine what rights flow from each instrument, what procedural steps are required to pursue collection, and what defences the obligors might successfully raise.

Promissory Notes: Creation, Transfer, and Enforcement

A promissory note represents one of the most fundamental instruments in commercial law, serving as a written promise by one party to pay a specified sum of money to another party either on demand or at a determinable future date. Unlike a cheque, which involves three parties and operates as an order to a bank to pay, a promissory note creates a direct two-party relationship between the person making the promise and the person entitled to receive payment. This distinction matters significantly for Canadian business owners, sole proprietors, and non-profit operators because promissory notes frequently arise in contexts where traditional bank financing is unavailable, impractical, or simply unnecessary. The foundational legislation governing promissory notes across Canada is the Bills of Exchange Act, a federal statute that applies uniformly in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario, and all other common law provinces. Quebec presents a unique situation where the Bills of Exchange Act applies to negotiable instruments as federal legislation, but the underlying contractual relationships and enforcement mechanisms may also engage provisions of the Civil Code of Quebec, creating a dual framework that operators in that province must understand.

The Bills of Exchange Act, as of the date of authorship, defines a promissory note as an unconditional promise in writing made by one person to another, signed by the maker, engaging to pay on demand or at a fixed or determinable future time a sum certain in money to or to the order of a specified person or to bearer. Each element of this definition carries legal weight and determines whether the document qualifies as a true promissory note with all the special characteristics that negotiable instruments enjoy, or whether it constitutes merely a contractual acknowledgment of debt without those characteristics. The requirement that the promise be unconditional means that a document stating "I promise to pay five thousand dollars if the goods are satisfactory" fails to qualify as a promissory note because the promise depends on a condition. The sum must be certain, meaning the amount is either stated explicitly or can be calculated with precision from the face of the document. A promise to pay "whatever amount the goods are worth" lacks this certainty and cannot function as a negotiable instrument. The maker must sign the document, and while electronic signatures have gained acceptance in many commercial contexts, the specific requirements for negotiable instruments under federal law maintain stricter formalities that business owners should verify with qualified legal counsel before assuming electronic execution suffices.

That’s the free preview

You’ve reached the end of what’s open to read. The rest of this lesson is part of a $79 course — purchasing unlocks it, or sign in if you already have access.