← University
Neighbour Disputes: Easements, Encroachments, and Nuisance
0 of 4

A boundary survey commissioned in anticipation of refinancing revealed that the rear wall of a storage addition constructed 8 years earlier by the owner of a commercial property in a mixed-use district extended approximately 45 centimetres onto the adjacent lot. The adjacent lot, operated as a small-batch food production facility, had been under the same ownership for 12 years. The survey finding set in motion a dispute that would eventually encompass not only the encroachment itself but also a longstanding easement and complaints about operational disturbances that had simmered for months.

The 2 properties share a common boundary running roughly 30 metres along their rear lot lines. When the current owner of the storage facility purchased that property 6 years ago, title disclosed a registered easement granting the food production operator the right to use a 3-metre-wide strip along the eastern edge of the storage facility's lot for vehicular access to a rear loading area. The easement had been created by express grant 18 years earlier when both properties were under common ownership and had been exercised continuously since. The storage facility owner, unfamiliar with the easement's precise terms at the time of purchase, later installed bollards and a chain-link gate across the access strip, asserting that the food production operator's delivery trucks were damaging the surface and creating liability exposure.

The encroachment complicated matters further. The storage addition predated the current owner's acquisition, and no survey had been obtained at closing. The food production operator, upon learning of the survey results, demanded removal of the encroaching wall and restoration of the lot to its original condition. The storage facility owner responded that the structure had stood without objection for nearly a decade and that removal would be disproportionately costly.

Layered onto these disputes were the food production operator's grievances about exhaust fumes from diesel generators that the storage facility ran during frequent power interruptions, and the storage facility owner's complaints about early-morning delivery noise and odours from the food production process. Both operators had documented incidents over the preceding 14 months, exchanged increasingly sharp correspondence, and consulted legal counsel. Neither had yet commenced formal proceedings, but settlement discussions had stalled, and each party was weighing litigation against other resolution options. The properties remained in active commercial use throughout, with ongoing friction affecting daily operations on both sides of the boundary.

Encroachments: When a Structure Crosses a Property Line

Encroachment in Canadian property law refers to a situation where a structure, building, or other permanent improvement physically crosses from one property onto an adjacent property without the permission of the owner whose land is being occupied. Unlike easements, which typically involve rights of passage or use, encroachments involve the actual presence of a physical object or structure on land belonging to someone else. The legal significance of this concept stems from one of the most fundamental principles in property law: the right of an owner to exclusive possession and use of their land. When a fence, wall, building foundation, eaves, roof overhang, garage, shed, or even tree roots extend beyond a property boundary, the owner of the encroaching structure may be liable for trespass, and the affected neighbour may have rights to seek remedies ranging from removal of the structure to monetary compensation.

The origins of encroachment law in Canada derive from common law principles of trespass that were inherited from English law and have been adapted through provincial legislation and judicial interpretation over centuries. In Quebec, the concept is governed by the Civil Code of Quebec, which provides a distinct framework rooted in civil law tradition rather than common law. Across common law provinces such as British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario, and others, the principles are largely similar, though the specific statutory provisions and procedural mechanisms can vary. What remains consistent across all Canadian jurisdictions is the recognition that property boundaries must be respected and that those who build structures that cross those boundaries face potential legal consequences. Understanding these principles is essential for any business owner, non-profit operator, or professional who owns or leases commercial property, as the financial and operational implications of encroachment disputes can be substantial.

That’s the free preview

You’ve reached the end of what’s open to read. The rest of this lesson is part of a $79 course — purchasing unlocks it, or sign in if you already have access.