Calendar·Risk Management·Risk Transfer And Insurance
Risk Retention vs. Risk Transfer: The Decision Framework
FACULTY OF RISK MANAGEMENTRisk Transfer And Insurance • ~30 min

How Canadian organizations decide which risks to retain and which to transfer — the decision framework, the cost of retention vs. transfer, and when self-insurance makes sense.

Risk Retention vs. Risk Transfer: The Decision Framework

Price
$79
Lessons
4
Enroll
Share
EmailLinkedIn

What this course covers

01The Risk Financing Decision: Retain, Transfer, or Share
02The True Cost of Risk Retention: What Organizations Often Underestimate
03When Risk Transfer Makes Sense: The Decision Criteria
04Self-Insurance and Captives: When Retention Becomes a Strategy

Scenario

A regional food manufacturing and distribution company based in southwestern Ontario has operated for 22 years, growing from a small family operation into an enterprise with 3 production facilities, a fleet of 47 refrigerated trucks, and approximately 340 employees across manufacturing, logistics, and administrative functions. Annual revenues reached $58 million in the most recent fiscal year, and the company supplies private-label products to grocery chains across Ontario and into western Quebec. The chief financial officer, who joined the organization 4 years ago from a publicly traded competitor, has been pressing the ownership group to reconsider how the company finances its operational risks.

For most of its history, the company purchased comprehensive commercial insurance through a regional broker, renewing policies annually with incremental premium increases that ownership viewed as a cost of doing business. That approach came under strain 18 months ago when the company's commercial general liability insurer declined to renew coverage following 2 product contamination claims in a single policy year—neither of which resulted in illness but both of which triggered significant investigation and remediation costs. The company secured replacement coverage through a specialty market, but the new policy carries a $250,000 per-occurrence deductible compared to the $25,000 deductible on the previous policy, and annual premiums increased by 38 percent despite the higher retention.

The CFO has prepared an analysis suggesting that the company is now effectively self-insuring a substantial layer of risk without the corresponding infrastructure to manage that exposure. Historical loss data shows that over the past 10 years, the company has experienced an average of 3.2 general liability claims annually, with individual claim values ranging from $8,000 to $410,000 and a median value of approximately $67,000. Workers' compensation costs have followed a similar pattern of increasing frequency, with lost-time injury rates running 15 percent above industry benchmarks for food manufacturing operations.

The ownership group has asked the CFO to present options at the next quarterly board meeting. The analysis must address whether the company should attempt to return to a traditional fully-insured model, formalize its current high-deductible position into a structured self-insurance program with dedicated reserves, explore participation in an industry captive that several competing manufacturers have joined, or pursue some hybrid arrangement that layers retention and transfer differently across the company's various risk categories. The decision will commit capital, affect cash flow, and shape how the organization responds to adverse events for years to come.

More in this program

Contractual Risk Allocation: Indemnities and Hold Harmless Clauses
~50 min · $149
Insurance as a Risk Transfer Tool: Matching Coverage to Exposure
~50 min · $149
Captive Insurance and Self-Insurance Structures
~30 min · $79

Rate this course

Complete the course to share your rating and feedback.