Practical Analysis

The Change That Ends Employment Without Saying So

Pay cuts, changes in duties and return to office mandates can create constructive dismissal risk even when the employer never issues a termination letter. HR needs consent, context and a record of the response.

A workplace can end an employment relationship without saying anyone is fired. The employer reduces compensation, removes essential duties, changes a longstanding working arrangement or imposes conditions fundamentally different from the agreement the employee accepted. The employee remains on payroll, at least for a time, and the organization may believe no termination has occurred. Constructive dismissal is the legal concept that makes those changes worth examining before they are announced. The central question is whether the change is unilateral, fundamental and substantial. Federal Labour Program guidance and Ontario's employment standards interpretation materials both identify the significance of a material change to a fundamental employment term without consent. The determination is objective and context specific. An employee's dislike of an ordinary management decision doesn't automatically make it a dismissal, but an employer's belief that the change was economically necessary doesn't necessarily resolve the contractual question either. HR needs the original agreement, the actual working conditions and an assessment of the effect of the proposed change. A pay cut is more than a budget measure when it changes the bargain.

This is a preview. Full access remains subject to the reading allowance or membership.

Opening this Binder HR briefing…

Was this useful?

Keep the value working

Have Binder keep watching this for you.

Follow the issue, see what changes next and keep related Canadian developments attached to the same business context.

0Related developments
0Related cases
0Premium tools

Read the source ↗