Practical Analysis

The Employment Contract Needs to Work After the Hiring Conversation Is Over

Probation, fixed terms, restrictive covenants and new agreements after hiring can fail in ways that a signed document doesn't fix. HR should review what each clause actually does.

The employment contract often receives more attention before a new hire starts than during the years when the relationship actually operates. HR obtains a signature, files the agreement and moves on to onboarding. Later, a supervisor wants to restrict where the employee can work after leaving, extend probation, change compensation or rely on a fixed end date. The contract is retrieved and the organization discovers that the label on a clause doesn't necessarily reflect its legal effect. A noncompete clause isn't the same as a confidentiality agreement. Restrictions against working for a competitor raise serious mobility concerns and are closely scrutinized. Ontario's Employment Standards Act generally prohibits employers from entering into noncompete agreements with employees on or after October 25, 2021, subject to specified exceptions including certain executives and business sale circumstances. The statutory definition focuses on restricting competing work after employment. Other provinces apply their own legal framework, and an older Ontario agreement may still require a common law enforceability assessment. HR shouldn't lift a clause from a national template and assume it belongs in every local offer.

This is a preview. Full access remains subject to the reading allowance or membership.

Opening this Binder HR briefing…

Was this useful?

Keep the value working

Have Binder keep watching this for you.

Follow the issue, see what changes next and keep related Canadian developments attached to the same business context.

0Related developments
0Related cases
0Premium tools

Read the source ↗