Case card

Ms. V v The Kamloops and District Elizabeth Fry Society and another, 2026 BCHRT 198

The BC Human Rights Tribunal ordered disclosure of investigator interview records and temporary anonymity in a harassment complaint, but preserved legal advice privilege.

Source reviewed · Court holding

Held. The BC Human Rights Tribunal ordered disclosure of investigator interview records and temporary anonymity in a harassment complaint, but preserved legal advice privilege.

The BC Human Rights Tribunal ordered a nonprofit employer to disclose witness interview notes, interview memoranda and phone memoranda from a disputed workplace harassment investigation. Those records were relevant to its fairness. Litigation privilege wasn't established because preparing for litigation wasn't their dominant purpose. The Tribunal did not order disclosure of draft reports, the investigator's preliminary impressions or confidential legal advice.

In its September 15, 2026 procedural ruling, the Tribunal also granted temporary anonymity to the complainant but refused a broader publication ban. The underlying allegations remain disputed and haven't been decided on their merits.

Original tribunal reasons

Was this useful?
Follow this in Binder.

Keep the subject attached to your Binder interests so future Canadian developments can find their way back to you.

Binder · The business behind your business

Reading about it is one thing. Managing your own workplace issue is another.

An employment concern can involve conversations, records, accommodations, contracts and decisions. Keep the circumstances together before the next decision. Binder organizes what you know and helps you recognize what still needs attention.

Read the source ↗