← University
Wrongful Dismissal and Constructive Dismissal
0 of 9

A family-owned manufacturing company in southwestern Ontario had employed a production manager for 14 years when the ownership passed from the founder to the founder's adult children following the founder's retirement. The production manager had joined the company at age 38, working initially as a floor supervisor before being promoted to the management role 9 years into his tenure. His responsibilities had expanded over time to include scheduling, quality control oversight, and direct supervision of 22 production staff. The employment relationship had never been governed by a written contract, and the company had no formal policies addressing termination procedures, severance entitlements, or the circumstances under which employment might end.

Within 8 months of the ownership transition, the new leadership decided to restructure operations. The restructuring plan called for consolidating the production manager's role with that of the logistics coordinator, creating a single position with a significantly altered scope of duties, a different reporting structure, and a reduction in supervisory responsibility from 22 staff to 6. When presented with the proposed changes, the production manager was given 2 weeks to accept the new role or face termination. The new position would have required him to report to a newly hired operations director rather than directly to ownership, would have eliminated his quality control responsibilities entirely, and would have reduced his annual compensation by approximately 18 percent.

The production manager declined the restructured position and was terminated without cause. The company offered him 8 weeks of pay in lieu of notice, calculated on the basis of the statutory minimum under provincial employment standards legislation, plus an additional 2 weeks as a gesture of goodwill. The offer was conditional on his signing a release that would extinguish any further claims arising from his employment or its termination. The production manager was given 5 business days to accept the offer, with no suggestion that he seek independent legal advice before signing.

The production manager did not sign the release within the deadline. Instead, he retained employment counsel, who sent a demand letter asserting that the offer was grossly inadequate given his length of service, age at termination (then 52), and the specialized nature of his role in a niche manufacturing sector. The demand letter also alleged that the proposed restructuring itself had constituted constructive dismissal before the formal termination occurred. The company's response denied any wrongdoing and maintained that the severance offer was reasonable. The dispute escalated to litigation, requiring the company to defend its termination process, justify its notice calculation, and respond to claims for damages that extended well beyond the initial offer.

Reasonable Notice: The Common Law Entitlement and How It Is Calculated

When an employer terminates an employee without cause in Canada, a fundamental question arises that has significant financial implications for both parties: how much notice, or pay in lieu of notice, does the employee deserve? While employment standards legislation across the country establishes minimum notice periods that employers must provide, these statutory minimums represent only the floor of an employee's entitlement. Above this floor exists a far more substantial right rooted in the common law, one that Canadian courts have developed over more than a century of jurisprudence. This common law entitlement to reasonable notice often exceeds statutory minimums by a considerable margin, sometimes dramatically so, and understanding how it is calculated is essential knowledge for any business owner, operator, or organizational leader who employs staff in Canada.

The concept of reasonable notice emerges from a foundational principle in contract law: when parties enter into an employment relationship without specifying a fixed term or agreeing on how much notice will be required to end that relationship, the law implies a term into the contract. This implied term holds that either party may terminate the relationship, but the terminating party must provide reasonable notice to allow the other party to adjust to the change. For employees, this adjustment period represents the time reasonably needed to find comparable alternative employment. For employers, it represents the time needed to find a suitable replacement. In practice, however, the reasonable notice period is almost always discussed in the context of employer-initiated terminations without cause, because this is where the financial stakes become most significant and where disputes most frequently arise.

That’s the free preview

You’ve reached the end of what’s open to read. The rest of this lesson is part of a $249 course — purchasing unlocks it, or sign in if you already have access.