← University
Builders Risk and Course of Construction Coverage
0 of 4

A development company based in Toronto undertook the construction of a 28-storey residential condominium tower on a site it had acquired 3 years earlier through an arm's-length transaction. The project budget exceeded $95 million, with financing provided by a consortium of 2 institutional lenders who required evidence of builders risk insurance naming them as loss payees before any draw on the construction loan could be advanced. The development company engaged a general contractor under a stipulated-price contract valued at approximately $72 million, with a scheduled completion date 26 months from the commencement of excavation work.

The construction contract allocated responsibility for procuring builders risk coverage to the development company, which obtained a policy through its insurance broker with limits corresponding to the completed value of the structure. The policy named the development company as the first named insured, with the general contractor, all subcontractors of every tier, and the lending consortium listed as additional insureds or loss payees according to their respective interests. Coverage was written on an all-risk basis subject to standard exclusions, with the policy period running from groundbreaking through to substantial completion or first occupancy, whichever occurred earlier.

By month 14 of construction, the tower had reached its full height and the exterior envelope was nearly complete when a fire broke out on the 19th floor during overnight hours. The fire caused significant damage to structural steel, mechanical rough-ins, and interior finishing work across 4 floors before firefighters brought it under control. The direct physical damage was estimated at $4.2 million, but the project schedule was disrupted by approximately 5 months while engineers assessed structural integrity, damaged work was demolished, and replacement materials were procured and installed.

The extended timeline triggered substantial additional costs beyond the physical repair. The development company continued to pay interest on drawn loan amounts during the delay, incurred ongoing insurance premiums for the uncompleted structure, and absorbed consultant fees for revised scheduling and engineering review. Marketing commitments made to prospective purchasers required adjustment, and the delay pushed occupancy of the first units past the date when rental income had been projected to begin offsetting carrying costs. The general contractor submitted claims for extended general conditions and acceleration costs, while several subcontractors asserted that the delay entitled them to additional compensation under their respective contracts.

The development company's insurance broker received notice of the loss and began working with the insurer's adjuster to determine the scope of coverage available under the builders risk policy for both the direct physical damage and the consequential financial losses that continued to accumulate as reconstruction proceeded.

Managing the Builders Risk Policy Through the Project: Key Decision Points

Managing a builders risk policy through the life of a construction project requires constant attention to evolving circumstances, timely communication with insurers, and careful documentation at every stage. Unlike most commercial insurance policies that cover static operations, builders risk coverage protects a dynamic asset whose value, risk profile, and ownership interests change continuously from groundbreaking to final completion. The professional who understands the key decision points throughout the project lifecycle can prevent coverage gaps, ensure adequate limits, and facilitate smooth transitions when the time comes to convert from construction coverage to permanent property insurance. This lesson addresses the practical realities of administering builders risk coverage through each phase of construction, examining the obligations that arise, the decisions that must be made, and the consequences of getting those decisions wrong.

The legal foundation for managing builders risk policies throughout construction derives from the same provincial insurance legislation that governs property insurance generally, including the Insurance Act in Ontario, the Insurance Act in British Columbia, the Insurance Act in Alberta, and parallel statutes in other common law provinces. Quebec operates under its distinct framework established by the Civil Code of Quebec and the Act respecting insurance, which imposes somewhat different obligations regarding material changes in risk and policy administration. Across all Canadian jurisdictions, however, the fundamental principle remains consistent: the insured bears a continuing duty to disclose material changes in circumstances that might affect the insurer's assessment of risk. This duty does not end when the policy is issued but persists throughout the policy period, taking on particular significance in construction contexts where change is the norm rather than the exception. Standard builders risk forms used across Canada, whether based on Insurance Bureau of Canada forms or manuscript policies developed by individual insurers, typically include provisions requiring notification of various events, changes in construction value, delays in completion, and alterations to the project scope. Understanding these notification triggers and responding to them appropriately represents one of the most important aspects of builders risk policy management.

That’s the free preview

You’ve reached the end of what’s open to read. The rest of this lesson is part of a $79 course — purchasing unlocks it, or sign in if you already have access.