← University
Remedies and the Cost of a Finding of Discrimination
0 of 4

A decision issued by a provincial human rights tribunal found that a regional manufacturing company with approximately 85 employees had discriminated against a former production supervisor on the basis of disability. The decision, running to 47 pages, concluded that the company failed to accommodate the supervisor's return to work following a medical leave and ultimately terminated her employment in circumstances that constituted discrimination under provincial human rights legislation.

The supervisor had worked for the company for 11 years before developing a chronic condition that required intermittent absences and modifications to her work schedule. Following a 4-month medical leave, she sought to return to her position with accommodations recommended by her treating physician, including a graduated return starting at 4 hours per day and restrictions on prolonged standing. The company's response to these requests formed the core of the complaint. Internal emails produced during the tribunal proceedings showed that senior management had characterized the accommodations as operationally impractical and had explored whether restructuring could eliminate the supervisor's position. Within 6 weeks of the supervisor's return-to-work request, the company advised her that her role no longer existed and offered a severance package equivalent to 8 weeks of pay.

The supervisor filed a human rights complaint 3 months after her termination. The matter proceeded through investigation, mediation that did not resolve the dispute, and ultimately a 5-day hearing held over 14 months after the complaint was filed. The tribunal's decision, released 4 months after the hearing concluded, found that the company had failed to demonstrate that accommodating the supervisor would have caused undue hardship and that the timing and circumstances of the termination were inextricably linked to her disability and accommodation needs.

The tribunal reserved on remedies pending further submissions from the parties. The company now faces the question of what a finding of discrimination will cost—not only in terms of the formal remedies the tribunal may order but also in the broader financial, operational, and organizational consequences that flow from such a finding. The supervisor's counsel has filed submissions seeking compensation for lost wages since termination, general damages for injury to dignity, and systemic remedies requiring the company to revise its accommodation policies and undergo third-party monitoring. The company's board of directors has asked management to prepare a comprehensive assessment of the organization's total exposure.

Systemic Remedies: Policy Changes, Training, and Monitoring Orders

When a human rights tribunal finds that discrimination has occurred, the remedies available extend far beyond monetary compensation to the individual complainant. Among the most significant tools in a tribunal's remedial arsenal are systemic remedies, which address the root causes of discriminatory conduct rather than merely compensating for its effects. These remedies recognize that discrimination often stems from organizational practices, workplace cultures, or institutional blind spots that, if left unchanged, will continue to harm others long after the individual complaint has been resolved. For Canadian business owners, non-profit operators, and professionals, understanding systemic remedies is essential because they represent a fundamentally different kind of legal exposure than the damage awards discussed elsewhere in this course. While a compensatory award addresses past harm, a systemic remedy reshapes how an organization must operate going forward, sometimes for years after the initial finding.

The authority to order systemic remedies flows from the broad remedial powers granted to human rights tribunals across Canada. The Canadian Human Rights Act, as federal legislation, empowers the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal to order respondents to adopt special programs, policies, or practices designed to prevent similar discrimination in the future. Provincial and territorial human rights statutes contain comparable provisions, though the specific language varies. The Human Rights Code in British Columbia, the Alberta Human Rights Act, the Saskatchewan Human Rights Code, the Human Rights Code in Ontario, and the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms in Quebec all grant their respective adjudicative bodies the power to order remedies that go beyond individual compensation. As of the date of authorship, these statutes consistently recognize that effective human rights enforcement requires addressing systemic factors, not just individual instances of wrongdoing. Quebec's approach under its civil law framework is notable because the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms holds quasi-constitutional status, and the Human Rights Tribunal of Quebec operates with broad authority to fashion remedies that align with the Charter's foundational role in Quebec law. Across all jurisdictions, the underlying principle remains consistent: human rights legislation is remedial in nature, and tribunals are empowered to make orders that will prevent future discrimination, not merely redress past violations.

That’s the free preview

You’ve reached the end of what’s open to read. The rest of this lesson is part of a $79 course — purchasing unlocks it, or sign in if you already have access.