Yukon · HR

Coverage connected to Yukon, with verified short holdings, original analysis and links to the underlying sources. A publication date isn't the same as a decision date. The dates below identify which is shown.

18 verified publications. Showing the 18 most recent.

Decision 2010-01-15 · Open coverage

Carpenter v Town of Faro, January 15, 2010

The Yukon Human Rights Board accepted evidence that a councillor made racist remarks about an Inuvialuit applicant for the town's senior administrative job. It nevertheless dismissed his hiring complaint because the evidence didn't connect those attitudes to his exclusion from the shortlist, and refused the town's request for costs.

Decision 2025-10-30 · Open coverage

Walsh v Northern Environment Services, October 30, 2025

A Yukon employer dismissed a newly hired worker after a mine rejected his COVID 19 vaccine exemption and an airline initially refused to let him board. The Human Rights Board found disability discrimination where the company supplied no evidence of an occupational requirement or undue hardship, and awarded $17,500.

Decision 2018-06-20 · Open coverage

Budge v Talbot Arm Motel and Eikland, June 20, 2018

Yukon's Human Rights Board found that a motel owner sexually harassed a male employee by repeatedly trying to pull down his pants. The employer was liable even though the other owner didn't know about the incidents, and both respondents were ordered to pay $5,000 jointly.

Decision 2026-05-28 · Open coverage

Antony v Yukon University, May 28, 2026

A Yukon human rights adjudicator found that the university's decision not to renew a repeatedly extended term contract was influenced by an employee's experience of domestic violence. It awarded $35,000 for injury to dignity and $19,738.88 for a further 3 months of wages.

Decision 2013-06-18 · Open coverage

Lacosse and Dyck v Childhood Discoveries Preschool (2013)

A Yukon daycare owner was held personally responsible for failing to prevent or correct workplace sexual harassment by a supervisor. Both employees received $5,000 for injury to dignity, together with their proven lost earnings.

Decision 2026-06-17 · Open coverage

Kushner v First Nation of Nacho Nyak Dun, 2026 YKSC 46

An expressly dismissed worker could plead wrongful dismissal, but not constructive dismissal. Some allegations of employer mistreatment survived because they might support additional damages. No liability or damages were decided.

Decision 2026-09-11 · Open coverage

Boles v Yukon Department of Education, 2026 YKSC 78

A Yukon Teacher on Call's civil claim over her probationary dismissal was struck because labour legislation and the collective agreement governed the dispute. Judicial review of the Deputy Minister's decision remained available. The court did not decide whether the dismissal was justified.

Decision 2026-02-16 · Open coverage

Workers’ Safety and Compensation Board v Sundin, 2026 YKSC 10

The Yukon Supreme Court quashed a compensation appeal panel’s increased benefits award because the panel had not adequately explained why the worker qualified for an exceptional earnings calculation. The entitlement was remitted for reconsideration.

Decision 2010-10-05 · Open coverage

Yukon v McBee, 2010 YKCA 8

The Yukon Court of Appeal allowed the Human Rights Commission's appeal after a trial judge set aside a discrimination ruling and sent the complaint to the wrong institution. A fresh Board hearing remained possible unless the Commission or complainant withdrew the referral. The Court made no fresh finding of discrimination.

Published 2026-10-23 · Open coverage

Hureau v Yukon Human Rights Board of Adjudication, 2014 YKSC 21

The Yukon Supreme Court awarded an employee $5,000 in dignity damages and held her employer liable after a tribunal found workplace sexual harassment but denied that remedy. A short period of misconduct didn't cancel proven injury.

Decision 2026-08-27 · Open coverage

Grant v Government of Yukon

A Yukon human rights board found that repeated ancestry and sex based remarks by a highways supervisor amounted to harassment and that the government failed to prevent or rectify it. The employer was ordered to pay $44,000.

Decision 2026-02-16 · Open coverage

Workers’ Safety and Compensation Board v Sundin, 2026 YKSC 10

The Yukon Supreme Court quashed a compensation appeal panel’s increased benefits award because the panel had not adequately explained why the worker qualified for an exceptional earnings calculation. The entitlement was remitted for reconsideration.

Decision 2026-09-11 · Open coverage

Boles v Yukon Department of Education, 2026 YKSC 78

A Yukon Teacher on Call's civil claim over her probationary dismissal was struck because labour legislation and the collective agreement governed the dispute. Judicial review of the Deputy Minister's decision remained available. The court did not decide whether the dismissal was justified.

Decision 2026-06-17 · Open coverage

Kushner v First Nation of Nacho Nyak Dun, 2026 YKSC 46

An expressly dismissed worker could plead wrongful dismissal, but not constructive dismissal. Some allegations of employer mistreatment survived because they might support additional damages. No liability or damages were decided.

Keep this subject in view.

See how a weekly briefing brings relevant developments together. Choose your divisions and jurisdictions before deciding whether membership is useful for you.

A preview doesn't enroll you in email. Optional delivery requires a separate choice.